tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post2898837586897053825..comments2024-03-28T02:35:27.154+00:00Comments on Eccles is saved: Holy Father expected to resign soonEccleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00357168852208499013noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-41077261777080203392017-01-02T02:53:41.730+00:002017-01-02T02:53:41.730+00:00Putting who right? Francis is at the left of every...Putting who right? Francis is at the left of everybody already.Comfyteorhttp://127.0.0.1noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-51202577847982808152017-01-02T00:50:11.033+00:002017-01-02T00:50:11.033+00:00Dear Nicolas.
It's 1st January not the 1st Apr...Dear Nicolas.<br />It's 1st January not the 1st April.JARayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18138004129894177863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-88257000982625475482017-01-01T15:48:20.464+00:002017-01-01T15:48:20.464+00:00By odd of course one means that the 260 odd popes ...By odd of course one means that the 260 odd popes just got it all wrong whereas Pope Francis is putting us right.Nicolas Bellordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08063019108964247676noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-54684734175927614282017-01-01T15:40:09.308+00:002017-01-01T15:40:09.308+00:00Surely Eccles 260 Popes were odd and only the rema...Surely Eccles 260 Popes were odd and only the remaining five were not odd. Of course Pope Francis is definitely one of those five not odd but I cannot remember who the other four were.Nicolas Bellordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08063019108964247676noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-14971569922837350002016-12-31T23:40:15.374+00:002016-12-31T23:40:15.374+00:00Yes, "260-odd" means "about 260&quo...Yes, "260-odd" means "about 260". You don't need a subscription to the Tablet (and who would want one?) to read the Castro piece linked to, do you?<br /><br />Happy new year, folks, and stay saved.Eccleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00357168852208499013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-31355692518330448862016-12-31T18:59:43.404+00:002016-12-31T18:59:43.404+00:00In all seriousness, missed the Ivereigh tower ramb...In all seriousness, missed the Ivereigh tower ramblings about the late, great inFidel, but did he really say, or even imply that it was somehow the fault of the US that the yes-a-brutal-dictator-but-oh-so-much-more tried to crush the Church?<br />(As non-subscriber, can't read rest of the fable)<br />Save the Liturgy, Save the World!Scelatahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08674226359189392827noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-32013754492102172202016-12-31T18:55:21.355+00:002016-12-31T18:55:21.355+00:00Pretty sure Eccles meant to imply that there were ...Pretty sure Eccles meant to imply that there were 5 pope who were not necessarily to be counted among the "odd" ones...<br />(Save the Liturgy, Save the World)Scelatahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08674226359189392827noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-15952461336559368822016-12-31T13:44:42.632+00:002016-12-31T13:44:42.632+00:00Here in Britain the suffix "-odd" when a...Here in Britain the suffix "-odd" when added to a number means that the number given is a reasonable approximation which, in the context of the article, is not meant to exclude any legitimate pope. I hope this is helpful. Patriciushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08906131174326742939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4508374680487030801.post-71876667105535210172016-12-31T11:22:33.030+00:002016-12-31T11:22:33.030+00:00"...the 260-odd previous popes"...
Who a..."...the 260-odd previous popes"...<br />Who are the 5 popes that we should not count among the previous ones?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com