"I don't need any assistance, thank you very much."
Still, things have drifted slightly since the 1960s, and it became necessary to clarify whether one was allowed to bump someone off on the basis of their gender (sex). Having Auntie Moly around the house all day long drinking gin is such a nuisance, and I would have preferred an uncle, with whom I would have had more in common. He would probably have helped with the garden too. Auntie Moly's presence is damaging my health, indeed you might exaggerate 100 times and say that my life is in danger. So I can murder her, right?
WRONG. The law forbids this. Or does it?
"Legislation isn't needed," says Yvette Cooper.
Yvette Cooper ("the only woman with Balls" as a rude joke has it) thinks that legislation to clarify this matter would be a bad idea. As explained by Tim Stanley, the arguments against making sex-selective murder illegal are:
0. It's already illegal, but we mustn't say so, as that will stop people from doing it. 1. Using the word "murder" isn't in the spirit of anti-murder legislation. 2. There are faults specific to each sex, e.g. men are lazy and women are garrulous (or vice-versa) and so, er, this is a bad idea. 3. Stopping murders may cause people to murder, in frustration at not being allowed to murder. 4. It stigmatises the "murdering community".
Jack the Ripper. Chose his victims by gender, but don't stigmatise him!
So, no change there, then. Murder remains mostly illegal, even though everyone's doing it. Murder on the basis of the victim's sex is also illegal, but we mustn't say so. And in fact, the law will probably turn a blind eye if you try it. British justice - the finest in the world!