This is me, Eccles

This is me, Eccles
This is me, Eccles

Sunday, 12 February 2017

New edition of the Bible announced

Pope Francis has announced that a new edition of the Bible is to be released, removing some of the more "rigid" books (e.g. the four gospels) and adding a few new ones. After all, the Bible was put together about 1500 years ago. It was reaffirmed by the Council of Trent in 1546, although at the time some liberals imbued with the "Spirit of Trent" tried to slip in a few extras that took their fancy. In any case, it isn't modern and up to date!

Pope and Bible

The New Non-Rigid Bible will have a loose-leaf format so that pages can be added and removed as doctrine develops.

Of course the Protestant denominations have their own versions of the canon: for example, the Church of England's attendance is usually much higher on days when the (very salacious) Memoirs of Henry VIII are used for the Gospel reading.

It is expected that Amoris Laetitia will be added as a book of the Non-Rigid Bible as part of the "Very New Testament" - and possibly renamed the Book of Francis - but since it does not claim to date from 1st Century times, Mgr Antonio Spadaro is cobbling together the less rigid bits of Matthew/Mark/Luke/John into a new Gospel according to St Eric (the little-known 5th evangelist who left the group before they became famous). Any claims that "St Eric" is merely a Spadarine sockpuppet will be angrily disputed.

sockpuppet

An artist's impression of St Eric the Evangelist.

St Eric does give an account of some of Christ's teaching, but, as today's Gospel (Matthew 5:17-37) shows, there are "problem" parts where Christ was either misquoted or - according to Jesuit theology - simply got it wrong.

Do not imagine that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets.

We need to add a few sentences here to explain that, although the Law is still in existence, it is to be superseded by Mercy, Discernment, and generally feeling At Peace With God. So in practice it is like the law against cycling on the pavement, and hardly ever obeyed.

If a man calls [his brother] "Renegade" he will answer for it with hell fire..

We need to rewrite this section to give a list of permitted insults, as used by the Holy Father. So you are allowed to call your brother a "Self-absorbed, Promethean neo-Pelagian" or a "Museum Mummy" or a "Pickled pepper-faced Christian" without feeling bad about it.

Teaching on adultery has always been a bit complicated.

Anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

There's a lot more on this subject that we really can't accept these days. Pope Francis didn't hold two Synods on the Family, and write a confused exhortation loosely based on what he would have liked them to agree on, just so that we would end up following St Matthew's Gospel! I think we just have to assume that Christ was misheard at this point, and actually said "No one" rather than "Anyone". Spadaro, fix this please!

All you need say is "Yes" if you mean yes, "No" if you mean no; anything more than this comes from the evil one.

Well, it was all right for Jesus. He didn't have the benefits of a Jesuit upbringing, and was quite used to answering binary questions without feeling obliged to obfuscate matters. Still, we can get round this one. The passage doesn't say you actually have to answer a question: so, if some rude people submit "dubia" to you, it is perfectly in order to pretend they never reached you, even if people plaster posters round your house and print fake newspapers on the subject. Just stick your fingers in your ears and say "La la la, I can't hear you!"

Of course fake newspapers (such as the Washington Post) should really be used for character assassinations of "rigid" cardinals.

This New Non-Rigid Bible still requires a lot of work, but should be in the shops for Christmas. Updates to its Catholic teaching will be provided every time Pope Francis takes an aeroplane trip.

6 comments:

  1. I'm confident Mgr. Spadaro's mathematics will prove conclusively that the 'Book of Francis' is derived from the first century.

    ReplyDelete
  2. - "but monsignor, you simply cannot count the first century from an arbitrary year, it has to start from the birth of Christ!"
    - "Oh, that guy who got nailed? why?"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some years ago I was in the unfortunate situation of hearing Mass (?) celebrated by a priest utilising a loose-leaf folder in place of The Missal. He was a liturgist trained in Paris and let loose upon the Lancaster Diocese. There is probably nothing new in parody, it has almost certainly actually occurred somewhere!

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was Piers Morgan, a Catholic with impeccable theological training, who suggested that we merely remove the bits of the Bible that people find offensive. Eminently sensible! Perhaps we could ask the Muslims to do the same to the Koran (although we would then only have the ISBN number and the Title but hey ho, everyone must sacrifice something so that we all get along. Could we ask Piers to contact the Grand Mufti and get things rolling?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here's hoping the soft-cover colouring book version for children(of all ages)and babies' rag book in chewable organic non-bleached cotton will be ready by Christmas too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Will the new Non-Rigid Bible be a modern, contemporary, up-to-date version of the Jefferson Bible:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

    ReplyDelete